“IMWAN for all seasons.”



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 114 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  ( Next )
Author Message
 Post subject: This is awkward . . . . but Marvel movies are better because the material is better.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 8:55 pm 
User avatar
It scorched

Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 68692
Bannings: One too few . . .
I'm just going to come right out and say something. Puttin' it on the table.

Marvel's movies have been better, done better, and have a brighter future because . . . the material and characters Marvel has to work with are, one the whole, stronger and more interesting.

The following specifics should be kept in mind.

1. Batman is as strong or stronger than anything Marvel's got. He's the DC anchor.
2. Superman has potential to re-acquire the throne that is rightfully his, if they can get the tone right.
3. But after that, it's a rout in favor of Marvel in terms of interesting heroes, interesting villains, interesting story lines.

After the Big Two, I just don't think DC can match up with Spider-man, Wolverine, the X-Men at large, Captain America, Thor, Iron Man, Hulk, the Avengers generally. And then there's Daredevil and FF waiting in the wings to shake off the fail.

The world is kind of scratching its head, wondering why DC has not been able to nail it like the Marvel movies have done. But maybe they're getting out some of these comic books and seeing stuff that's just not as compelling.

I thought I suffered from Childhood Bias Syndrome. But I'm starting to think "Yeah, Marvel was better than DC in its Silver/Bronze/Shooter Age conceptions."

_________________
Rom's kiss turned Rogue a hero.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: This is awkward . . . . but Marvel movies are better because the material is better.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 8:57 pm 
User avatar
Traveler

Joined: 03 Dec 2006
Posts: 33377
Location: 2015
Bannings: 3
This is awkward.

_________________
Are you ready? Are you ready to jump right off the edge of everything?

Image


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: This is awkward . . . . but Marvel movies are better because the material is better.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 8:58 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 22 Aug 2004
Posts: 40603
Marvel Studios has Kevin Fiege.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: This is awkward . . . . but Marvel movies are better because the material is better.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 8:58 pm 
User avatar
It scorched

Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 68692
Bannings: One too few . . .
In your defense, I will say that Watchmen was good, even gnarly.

_________________
Rom's kiss turned Rogue a hero.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: This is awkward . . . . but Marvel movies are better because the material is better.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 8:59 pm 
User avatar
It scorched

Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 68692
Bannings: One too few . . .
Fraxon! wrote:
Marvel Studios has Kevin Fiege.


That's the conventional explanation. But I've seen behind the veil to the real truth.

_________________
Rom's kiss turned Rogue a hero.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: This is awkward . . . . but Marvel movies are better because the material is better.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:00 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 22 Aug 2004
Posts: 40603
Li'l Jay wrote:
Fraxon! wrote:
Marvel Studios has Kevin Fiege.


That's the conventional explanation. But I've seen behind the veil to the real truth.

Don't get me wrong, I'm a dyed-in-the-wool Marvel kid, so I completely agree with you. But none of it works as well as it has without Fiege.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: This is awkward . . . . but Marvel movies are better because the material is better.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:02 pm 
User avatar
It scorched

Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 68692
Bannings: One too few . . .
Fraxon! wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I'm a dyed-in-the-wool Marvel kid, so I completely agree with you. But none of it works as well as it has without Fiege.


What do you think he would do if he was at Warner Bros.?

_________________
Rom's kiss turned Rogue a hero.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: This is awkward . . . . but Marvel movies are better because the material is better.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:04 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 22 Aug 2004
Posts: 40603
Li'l Jay wrote:
Fraxon! wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I'm a dyed-in-the-wool Marvel kid, so I completely agree with you. But none of it works as well as it has without Fiege.


What do you think he would do if he was at Warner Bros.?

Same thing he's doing at Marvel. Making great movies.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: This is awkward . . . . but Marvel movies are better because the material is better.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:07 pm 
User avatar
It scorched

Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 68692
Bannings: One too few . . .
But Feige doesn't explain the strong turn of the X-Men franchise, or the Amazing Spider-man franchise. I don't think.

That's where it's getting awkward -- little boomlets of win are breaking out over here, over there.

_________________
Rom's kiss turned Rogue a hero.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: This is awkward . . . . but Marvel movies are better because the material is better.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:14 pm 
User avatar
Traveler

Joined: 03 Dec 2006
Posts: 33377
Location: 2015
Bannings: 3
I want to point out that Jay is a poopyhead and his face is stupid and smells.

_________________
Are you ready? Are you ready to jump right off the edge of everything?

Image


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: This is awkward . . . . but Marvel movies are better because the material is better.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:17 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2006
Posts: 35552
Location: Between the thumb and the wrist.
Li'l Jay wrote:
I'm just going to come right out and say something. Puttin' it on the table.

Marvel's movies have been better, done better, and have a brighter future because . . . the material and characters Marvel has to work with are, one the whole, stronger and more interesting.

The following specifics should be kept in mind.

1. Batman is as strong or stronger than anything Marvel's got. He's the DC anchor.
2. Superman has potential to re-acquire the throne that is rightfully his, if they can get the tone right.
3. But after that, it's a rout in favor of Marvel in terms of interesting heroes, interesting villains, interesting story lines.

After the Big Two, I just don't think DC can match up with Spider-man, Wolverine, the X-Men at large, Captain America, Thor, Iron Man, Hulk, the Avengers generally. And then there's Daredevil and FF waiting in the wings to shake off the fail.

The world is kind of scratching its head, wondering why DC has not been able to nail it like the Marvel movies have done. But maybe they're getting out some of these comic books and seeing stuff that's just not as compelling.

I thought I suffered from Childhood Bias Syndrome. But I'm starting to think "Yeah, Marvel was better than DC in its Silver/Bronze/Shooter Age conceptions."


I agree with this. Marvel's characters were created with more dimensions than DC's, and that's generally the starting point for the Marvel films. They have a built-in arc for the first films that the DC characters generally lack.

_________________
Daily art blog Very Short Drawings
Pay a visit to The Writers' Block, where writers, uh...write stuff!
Read my comic strip A Boy Called Monk
Read my comic book Town of Shadows


Top
  Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: This is awkward . . . . but Marvel movies are better because the material is better.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:18 pm 
User avatar
It scorched

Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 68692
Bannings: One too few . . .
I will balance things out nicely by saying I still like the Dark Knight most of all.

_________________
Rom's kiss turned Rogue a hero.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: This is awkward . . . . but Marvel movies are better because the material is better.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:24 pm 
User avatar
It scorched

Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 68692
Bannings: One too few . . .
Monk wrote:
I agree with this. Marvel's characters were created with more dimensions than DC's, and that's generally the starting point for the Marvel films. They have a built-in arc for the first films that the DC characters generally lack.


Yeah, it's the hook.
Iron Man -- the narcissistic weapons genius who discovers what sacrifice really means, and finds his purpose.

Hulk -- the raging force of nature inside a meek and mild scientist, that is our only hope against a much larger threat.

Captain America -- the super soldier from a simpler time and a simpler war, who may have something to teach us about what being a real hero means in these supposedly more complicated days.

Black Widow -- a Russian with a mysterious past, death-dealer. Bam, that's a show.

Spider-man -- a high school nerd who gets powers but still has some of the same issues we all faced as young people.

X-Men -- they have Wolverine. Without him it would go nowhere.

Thor -- an Asgardian who becomes fascinated with Earth yeah okay his hook is kind of elusive and Marvel pulled a rabbit out of a hat here.

Daredevil -- red leather can work as a fashion statement.

_________________
Rom's kiss turned Rogue a hero.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: This is awkward . . . . but Marvel movies are better because the material is better.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:25 pm 
User avatar
Dendritic Oscillating Ontological Tesseract

Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Posts: 51037
Location: Milwaukee
Marvel characters have more rhythmic variety and faster rates of harmonic change.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: This is awkward . . . . but Marvel movies are better because the material is better.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:25 pm 
User avatar
Traveler

Joined: 03 Dec 2006
Posts: 33377
Location: 2015
Bannings: 3
I'm a die hard DC fan. I've rarely liked Marvel. But, you know? In those sleepless nights...I say to myself "Arrow is supposed to be good, and the Timm Justice League was fantastic. Marvel movies are great because Kevin Feige has an uncanny ability for long-term filmmaking, he may be a genius. That's the only reason why Marvel movies are so successful. And Warner Bros. is run by morons. That's it"

But in my most private moments, when I'm at my lowest ebb, I do think that maybe, just maybe, Marvel characters are just better than DC's.

_________________
Are you ready? Are you ready to jump right off the edge of everything?

Image


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: This is awkward . . . . but Marvel movies are better because the material is better.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:27 pm 
User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2006
Posts: 35552
Location: Between the thumb and the wrist.
Li'l Jay wrote:
Monk wrote:
I agree with this. Marvel's characters were created with more dimensions than DC's, and that's generally the starting point for the Marvel films. They have a built-in arc for the first films that the DC characters generally lack.


Yeah, it's the hook.
Iron Man -- the narcissistic weapons genius who discovers what sacrifice really means, and finds his purpose.

Hulk -- the raging force of nature inside a meek and mild scientist, that is our only hope against a much larger threat.

Captain America -- the super soldier from a simpler time and a simpler war, who may have something to teach us about what being a real hero means in these supposedly more complicated days.

Black Widow -- a Russian with a mysterious past, death-dealer. Bam, that's a show.

Spider-man -- a high school nerd who gets powers but still has some of the same issues we all faced as young people.

X-Men -- they have Wolverine. Without him it would go nowhere.

Thor -- an Asgardian who becomes fascinated with Earth yeah okay his hook is kind of elusive and Marvel pulled a rabbit out of a hat here.

Daredevil -- red leather can work as a fashion statement.


Thor - arrogant god learns humility.

_________________
Daily art blog Very Short Drawings
Pay a visit to The Writers' Block, where writers, uh...write stuff!
Read my comic strip A Boy Called Monk
Read my comic book Town of Shadows


Top
  Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: This is awkward . . . . but Marvel movies are better because the material is better.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:32 pm 
User avatar
It scorched

Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 68692
Bannings: One too few . . .
Monk wrote:
Thor - arrogant god learns humility.


Yeah, it's pretty good. But I suppose this is the one where they were most flirting with disaster, and I can't really neatly explain why it worked.

Even during Dark World, I was thinking "This villain is a silly man. Those are ray guns they are shooting at each other. But I'm enjoying this. Ha, look Thor just tried to hang up his hammer on a coat hook."

_________________
Rom's kiss turned Rogue a hero.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: This is awkward . . . . but Marvel movies are better because the material is better.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:36 pm 
User avatar
George Tuska Wonder Man

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Posts: 9935
Location: New York
Bannings: a couple..
Li'l Jay wrote:
I will balance things out nicely by saying I still like the Dark Knight most of all.

For the love of Thor, WHY?!?

TDK gets worse with every viewing...

_________________
Most of it is the guts to take a blow. Guts I have. And technique? I have a month to learn that.


Top
  Profile  
 

IMWAN Mod
 Post subject: This is awkward . . . . but Marvel movies are better because the material is better.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:37 pm 
User avatar
The Modfather; Wizard of WAN

Joined: 05 Oct 2006
Posts: 56220
Location: Under the Iron Bridge
Bannings: freely handed out
I think they have Captain America, Spider-Man, and the Fantastic Four over DC. There's no equivalent on that side for any of those characters. There are B-listers who are similar in characteristics, but nothing even long time comics fans would say compares.

However, that said:
Green Lantern - Iron Man potential, squandered
Teen Titans - X-Men potential, never visited (too many sidekicks?)
Superman - blow everything away potential, squandered.
Batman - Done well thanks to Nolan even after being potentially squandered.
Wonder Woman - Thor potential, and they run away from it at every turn (no Eddie, it's not because of her costume). Don't even give it a shot. We'll see in BvS.
Justice League - Can be done right as well as the Avengers; JL/JLU shows it's very possible to make the characters appealing to a large audience while still keeping the spirit of the comics alive. But what we've seen so far from MoS, I don't expect it to be.

The problem with DC is what many have said in other threads. They shun their history while Marvel Studios embraces theirs. While I do think Silver Age Marvel is leaps and bounds better than Silver Age DC, with more character driven storylines and concepts, DC spent more than enough time "catching up" later. There's a huge well to draw from, and it's ignored.


Top
  Profile  
 

IMWAN Mod
 Post subject: This is awkward . . . . but Marvel movies are better because the material is better.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:41 pm 
User avatar
The Modfather; Wizard of WAN

Joined: 05 Oct 2006
Posts: 56220
Location: Under the Iron Bridge
Bannings: freely handed out
Dave Powell wrote:
Li'l Jay wrote:
I will balance things out nicely by saying I still like the Dark Knight most of all.

For the love of Thor, WHY?!?

TDK gets worse with every viewing...

You really think so? I think it's great. Mostly because of Heath Ledger admittedly; his Joker is just so good. I think DKR, while an enjoyable enough film, is a huge letdown after DK though. As a trilogy, I think the third act fails.

My favorite superhero movies top five goes like this:
Captain America: Winter Soldier
Avengers
Dark Knight
Iron Man
Iron Man 3

Amazing Spider-Man is just on the outside looking in because of that hokey scene with the cranes, otherwise it would surpass Iron Man 3. Sorry Jay. :)


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: This is awkward . . . . but Marvel movies are better because the material is better.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:44 pm 
User avatar
What do you call a camel with three humps?

Joined: 21 Oct 2004
Posts: 58174
Location: Indiana
Jeff wrote:
Dave Powell wrote:
Li'l Jay wrote:
I will balance things out nicely by saying I still like the Dark Knight most of all.

For the love of Thor, WHY?!?

TDK gets worse with every viewing...

You really think so? I think it's great. Mostly because of Heath Ledger admittedly; his Joker is just so good. I think DKR, while an enjoyable enough film, is a huge letdown after DK though. As a trilogy, I think the third act fails.

My favorite superhero movies top five goes like this:
Captain America: Winter Soldier
Avengers
Dark Knight
Iron Man
Iron Man 3

Amazing Spider-Man is just on the outside looking in because of that hokey scene with the cranes, otherwise it would surpass Iron Man 3. Sorry Jay. :)


I think we have the same top 5, though I have a soft spot for the first Thor.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: This is awkward . . . . but Marvel movies are better because the material is better.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:45 pm 
User avatar
It scorched

Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 68692
Bannings: One too few . . .
Jeff wrote:
Wonder Woman - Thor potential, and they run away from it at every turn (no Eddie, it's not because of her costume). Don't even give it a shot. We'll see in BvS.


Wonder Woman labors under such a heavy burden of supposedly being THE woman superhero, the symbol that women can be as mighty and fighty as men, and carries all this political angst with getting the project right.

Meanwhile, Marvel just farts out a Black Widow and gets away without a scuffle.

_________________
Rom's kiss turned Rogue a hero.


Top
  Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  ( Next )
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 114 posts ]   



Who is WANline

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powdered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited

IMWAN is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide
a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk.